Chicago Blackhawks fans have noticed an intriguing trend this season: rookie forward Frank Nazar has been exceptionally good at drawing penalties, creating crucial power-play opportunities for the team. Yet, at the same time, last year’s standout rookie Connor Bedard — despite his speed, skill, and high hockey IQ — hasn’t been nearly as successful in that department this season.
This discrepancy raises an important question: If NHL referees tend to be hesitant to reward young players with calls, what explains Nazar’s current success in drawing penalties? And how does that compare with Bedard’s ability to draw penalties during his impressive rookie campaign? Could this be a matter of bias, or are there deeper psychological, situational, and skill-based factors influencing these outcomes?
The Perception of Rookie Bias in the NHL
It’s no secret that rookies in the NHL often face a steeper hill when it comes to getting favorable calls from referees. The concept of “rookie bias” suggests that officials are less likely to call penalties drawn by inexperienced players, perhaps because they are perceived as less trustworthy or less savvy compared to veterans. This perception stems from a long-standing tradition in hockey where respect is earned over time, and younger players must “prove themselves” before receiving the benefit of the doubt.
However, the success of Nazar this season — and Bedard last season — challenges this narrative. Nazar has been drawing penalties at an impressive rate despite his lack of NHL experience, suggesting that other factors might be at play.
Skill Sets and Playing Style: A Key Factor
One of the biggest factors that could explain Nazar’s success is his playing style. Nazar’s game is built around high-paced, shifty skating combined with quick directional changes, making him a nightmare for defenders to handle. His agility and unpredictability often force defenders to take desperate measures, leading to more stick infractions, hooks, and trips — precisely the kinds of penalties that referees tend to call.
In contrast, Bedard’s playing style is different. While Bedard’s elite puck handling and creativity often leave defenders flat-footed, his ability to create space and generate offense relies more on vision and positioning. Defenders who play against Bedard often focus on maintaining tight gaps and avoiding direct engagement, leading to fewer obvious infractions that referees can easily penalize.
Psychological and Reputation-Based Dynamics
Another interesting element is the psychological aspect of officiating. Referees, whether consciously or unconsciously, may be more inclined to penalize infractions against players who are seen as underdogs or less established, perhaps feeling a need to protect these players from being overwhelmed by physical play. Nazar, being a fresh face with fewer expectations compared to Bedard, may be benefiting from this dynamic.
On the flip side, Bedard’s reputation as a rising superstar may work against him in this regard. Elite players often receive extra defensive attention, and officials might be hesitant to call marginal penalties when defending such high-profile players, under the assumption that they can “handle it.” As Bedard transitions into a more established role in the league, referees may be giving defenders a bit more leeway when it comes to physicality.
Situational and Line Deployment Factors
It’s also worth considering the situational context in which Nazar and Bedard draw penalties. Nazar often finds himself in situations where he’s forcing defenders to react in transition, creating opportunities for penalties to be called. Bedard, however, frequently operates in tight, high-traffic areas where penalties may be harder for referees to spot.
Additionally, Bedard’s increased ice time against top defensive pairings means that he’s going up against more disciplined and experienced defenders, who are less likely to take penalties in the first place. In contrast, Nazar’s minutes — while significant — may come in situations where he’s facing defenders who are more prone to making mistakes.
Conclusion: More Than Just Rookie Bias at Play
The success of Frank Nazar in drawing penalties compared to Connor Bedard’s relative struggles this season suggests that there’s more to this story than just rookie bias. Nazar’s playing style, combined with situational factors and subtle psychological dynamics, may be influencing how referees make calls. While rookie bias may still be a factor in some cases, Nazar and Bedard’s experiences show that a blend of skill, reputation, and on-ice circumstances can play a significant role in how often young players get favorable calls. As both players continue to develop, it will be fascinating to see if these trends hold — or if their reputations and styles eventually level the playing field.
Leave a Reply